Press play and read
Kodo's 'Nanafushi' from Ibuki
At once the most primitive, and possibly the most complex, rhythm, for me, is the most important aspect of music. I would even go so far as to say that rhythm is music; for, without it, music could not be. Let us first have a look at the definition:
rhythm n. 1 a measured flow of words and phrases in verse or prose determined by various relations of long and short or accented and unaccented syllables. 2 the aspect of musical composition concerned with periodical accent and the duration of notes. 3 Physiol. movement with a regular succession of strong and weak elements. 4 a regularly recurring sequence of events. 5 Art a harmonious correlation of parts.
Definition courtesy of the Concise Oxford Dictionary
"...the aspect of musical composition concerned with periodical accent and the duration of notes..."
Think about that - "the duration of notes". I said rhythm is the most important aspect of music; the reason being that otherwise music would either be one continuous piece of silence (for there would be nothing to start it off), or a continuous mass of sound (for there would be nothing available to define the duration of it; that is, when the sound should stop). This idea is a far cry from what we understand as music, and so, for our music, rhythm is certainly the most important element. On its own, however, people may argue that it is not enough - that it needs 'something else' to make it music. But whether that is so or not, without it, the music they enjoy could not exist.
I also said that rhythm is the most primitive aspect of music. This is not meant in any way to simplify the concept of rhythm, or to contradictorily lessen the importance of it; I mean primitive in its truest (so far as I understand it) sense: it is primitive in that it is not dependant on anything else for its existence. All other aspects of music rely on one thing or another for their existence - melody couldn't exist without rhythm, harmony without melody, and all aspects, to greater or lesser degrees, without exception, rely on rhythm - only rhythm is the one thing that is independant, can exist on its own, is primitive. Of course, a sound is required for rhythm to be realised - e.g. hands clapping, fingers clicking, a heart beating, a drum being beaten - but this sound is in turn dependant upon rhythm for its existence (stick with it), so this sort of synergistic dependance cancels each other out, and rhythm remains to be primitive.
In fact, from a purist's point of view, the music you're hearing now is much more than this primitive rhythm I speak of. There are various different sizes of drums at work here, as well as those little cymbals providing the "tsing" sound. Pure, primitive rhythm, must be one single sound. As soon as a second instrument is introduced - however rhythmic it may be - or even, speaking as the purest purist around, if any dynamics are employed, or a slight difference in the sound produced from this one instrument (i.e. if a clarinet is used as the instrument of choice, the note must be the same note, with exactly the same velocity, dynamic and timbre; a drum must be hit in exactly the same manner, in the same part of the skin, with exactly the same force), if any of these things are altered - however rhythmic the instrument - semblances of melody appear, and it is no longer pure rhythm that is being created. This is nothing to get worried about, of course! Just a small point.
Rhythm is a very complex subject, much too complex to be fully explored now, so I'll leave it at that, and gear myself up for the next article, about Melody. But I will say that for any music to hold any interest for me, it must have interesting rhythms. It's no good for a piece of music to be a series of heavy, heavy, heavy, heavy, heavy bass beats every beat, every bar: that won't get me dancing. I wouldn't be dancing anyway, to be frank, but a meaninglessly monotonous rhythm (not that all monotonous rhythms are meaningless, mind you) does less than nothing for me, and I'd sooner murder the bastard who recorded the track containing such a device, than dance the night away to his lovingly crafted work. Or does he just do it for the money? He can't honestly get any artistic satisfaction out of such a piece of tripe. Can he? And it's all in fucking 4/4! Oh, somebody stop me before I go mad.
Ah, this music by Kodo. Relax, relax. Calming.
Can anyone identify which time-signature this is in? Answers, as usual, on a postcard.



